So our Mass goes back, without essential change, to the age when it first developed out of the oldest liturgy of all. It is still redolent of that liturgy, of the days when Cæsar ruled the world and thought he could stamp out the faith of Christ, when our fathers met together before dawn and sang a hymn to Christ as to a God. The final result of our enquiry is that, in spite of unsolved problems, in spite of later changes, there is not in Christendom another rite so venerable as ours. ~Fortescue
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
Palm Sunday
Monday, March 10, 2008
Sunday, March 2, 2008
Sanctæ Románæ Ecclésiæ Cardináles - Mgr. Nabuco


*

*

*

*

*

*






Wednesday, February 20, 2008
Episcopal Gloves - Chirothecæ





*



†


*
And here is what Nainfa has to say:
"The pontifical gloves are made of silk, and variously ornamented according to the solemnity of the occasion and the wearer s rank and dignity. For Cardinals, Prelates invested with the Episcopal character and Abbots, the back of the glove is embroidered with a more or less elaborate cross or monogram; and the Protonotaries Apostolic of the first two classes (di numero and supernumerary) may wear pontifical gloves of silk bordered with a strip of gold braid; but for all other Protonotaries, Prelates and Canons, who may be allowed, by law or privilege, the use of the pontificals, the gloves must be of plain silk without any special ornament. (Sort of like this picture, but without the circle in the back of hand)."
*
*
Friday, February 8, 2008
The Papal Fanon (Latin, Italian, English)

Materia et color: Fano conficitur e serico albo tenui non undulato et sine subsuto.
Forma: Fano fabricatur ad modum pallioli humeralis altitudinis dimidii metri et cum tribus circiter metris circumferentiæ et fit duplex cum parte interiore aliquantulum longiore. Partes duæ per uniones firmantur circumcirca collum et retro fit scissura ut possint per caput poni cum sint circulum clausum.
Ornamentatio: Fano papalis in utraque parte ornatur circumcirca virgis aureis, rubinis et albis interpositis, et ante pectus additur crux ex opere phrygio in perte superiore. Ad collum et ad utramque oram aureum torulum additur.

**Recentissime totus ritus fanonis immutatus est, nam non amplius ornatur virgis superpositis sed conficitur e serico ad hoc fabricato cum virgis in ipso serico textis trium colorum. Præterea partes duæ separantur ita ut sint revera duæ vestes, et pars superior pontifici imponitur post casulam.

È molto difficile rimontare alle origini di questo ornamento. Confuso forse in principio con il manipolo, o con l'amitto (anabolagio), o con gli oralia, specie di fazzoletti o tovaglioli, che servivano ad asciugare il sudore del capo e perciò portati intorno al collo, passò nella forma attuale verso il sec. XIII. Innocenzo III (nel De mysteriis Missæ, l. I, cap. 13) parla esplicitamente di questo ornamento che chiama orale: si è dunque al principio del sec. XIII.
Vari autori vogliono che l'uso dei vescovi greci di coprirsi la testa con un velo, quando hanno assunto gli ornamenti principali, abbia dato origine al fanone del papa; ma è cosa incerta. Altri, invece, e con essi lo stesso Innocenzo III, intendono far derivare il fanone dall'ephod del sommo sacerdote ebreo, anch'esso tessuto di strisce d'oro e colorate, ma di diversa forma. Con questa parola si designava anticamente un velo pendente da un'asta a guisa di bandiera, chiamato appunto gonfalone, stendardo, vessillo; oppure, secondo l'etimologia ecclesiastica, il velo pendente dal braccio dei ministri sacri detto manipolo, sudario, orale.
~Enrico Dante, da Enciclopedia Cattolica


The fanon is similar to an amice; it is, however, put on not under but above the alb. The pope wears it only when celebrating a solemn Pontifical Mass, that is, only when all the pontifical vestments are used. The manner of putting on the fanon recalls the method of assuming the amice universal in the Middle Ages and still observed by some of the older religious orders. After the deacon has vested the pope with the usual amice, alb, the cingulum and sub-cinctorium, and the pectoral cross, he places the fanon on the pope by means of the opening, and then folds half of the upper piece towards the back over the pope's head. Then he vests the pope with the stole, tunicle, dalmatic, and chasuble, after which he turns down that part of the fanon which had been placed over the head of the pope, draws the front half of the upper piece above the chasuble, and finally arranges the whole upper piece of the fanon so that it covers the shoulders of the pope like a collar. The pallium is placed over the fanon.

Monday, January 21, 2008
Traditional Candlemass

The traditional blessing of candles will start at 1pm and it will be followed by a procession inside the church. Then follows the Solemn Mass.
Fr. Richard Trezza will be the Celebrant, Fr. Matthew Talarico will be the Deacon and Fr. James Miara will be the Subdeacon.
All are invited and encouraged to attend.
Please, share this information with people who might be intested in attending this Mass.
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Science vs. Religion
*

“It is hard for me to understand the great role, especially in epochs of transition and uncertainty, played by fashion in science, a role only slightly inferior to that which it plays in women’s dress. Man is indeed an animal very susceptible to suggestion on every subject.” ~Einstein
Fr. Bruckberger :
Science has become a dangerous mastodon, an imbecile without true judgment or responsibility, but unhappily omnipotent, capable of crushing all men beneath its feet: it is the monster in Picasso’s “Minotauromachia.” It is imperative to domesticate this mastodon, it is absolutely necessary to reduce it very soon, if not to impotence, at least to obedience. Instead, it is we who do obeisance to it and bow before it; indeed we abdicate all judgment to it, our material security and our spiritual dignity, to the truth that we idolize – and this is abominable. Science is our Moloch, our Baal, our Astarte, we give it everything it demands, including our souls. We no longer look to God for our salvation, we look to science, we feel ourselves impotent and humble before it alone, we abdicate everything at its feet; nothing is too precious for us to convert into a burnt offering to science.
Scientism in its grossest, most outdated, most laggard form is still engaged in playing havoc with the traditional teachings of our religion… There is inevitable conflict (between science and religion) whenever science demands unquestioning respect that is actually idolatrous. Just the same, it is high time to tell science that it extrapolates, that it exaggerates, that it exasperates, that it is in our service and not we in its service and that, even if it is as big as Goliath, we do not recognize its right to make us bow down and worship it.
Tuesday, January 8, 2008
Canons
*